REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
EAS Consulting Group
Alexandria, Virginia
Regulatory consulting firm offering label and claims review, NDI notifications and training programs.
ENGAGEMENT
Project-based (consulting)
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
Regulatory consultants, claims review specialists, and certification support providers for dietary supplements. FDA and FTC compliance, structure-function claims, GMP auditing, organic certification, and third-party quality seals.
Showing 19 of 19 vendors
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Alexandria, Virginia
Regulatory consulting firm offering label and claims review, NDI notifications and training programs.
ENGAGEMENT
Project-based (consulting)
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Hampton, Virginia
Provider of label and ingredient review, master manufacturing record review and prior notice submissions.
ENGAGEMENT
Per registration or review
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Fairfield, Iowa
Offers recipe checking, regulatory change alerts and multi-country regulatory consulting for supplements.
ENGAGEMENT
Per certification or audit
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Orlando, Florida
Consultancy specializing in GRAS determinations, NDI notifications and ingredient safety assessments.
ENGAGEMENT
Project-based (consulting)
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Toronto, Ontario
Regulatory affairs firm offering NDI notifications, safety dossiers and US and Canadian market entry strategy.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Carlsbad, California
Regulatory consulting firm specializing in NDI notifications, labeling and regulatory strategy.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Not disclosed
Regulatory consulting firm offering NDI submissions, GRAS determinations and nonclinical safety assessments.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Not disclosed
Consulting firm offering facility visits, gap analysis and custom program development for supplements.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Not disclosed
Consulting firm for labeling, claims substantiation, computer systems validation and data integrity.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Not disclosed
Toxicology firm offering GRAS determinations, NDI support and risk assessments, including hemp ingredients.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Not disclosed
Scientific practice offering GRAS determinations, claim substantiation and dietary intake assessments.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Enumclaw, Washington
Regulatory firm preparing GRAS conclusions, GRAS notices, NDI notifications and feasibility assessments.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Rockville, Maryland
Consulting firm supporting NDI notifications, GRAS determinations and food additive petitions.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Not disclosed
Regulatory affairs firm with labeling and claims review, formulation review and NDI support for supplements.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Moab, Utah
Consultancy preparing standard operating procedures, master manufacturing records and specifications.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Burlington, Ontario
Regulatory firm offering NDI notifications, label review and natural health product licensing support.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Puyallup, Washington
Consulting firm preparing GRAS conclusions, NDI notifications and toxicology and safety assessments.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Vero Beach, Florida
Food toxicology firm preparing GRAS determinations, food additive petitions and NDI notifications.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Salt Lake City, Utah
Boutique advisory firm offering pre-market support and formula, claims, packaging and label review.
LEAD TIME
Not publicly disclosed
Last reviewed: April 2, 2026
See how each company connects to capabilities and certifications in the manufacturer atlas.
Every word on your supplement label and in your marketing materials is subject to federal regulation. The FDA governs labeling. The FTC governs advertising. State attorneys general can enforce both. A single unsupported claim can trigger a warning letter, an advertising inquiry, or a class-action lawsuit.
Certifications serve as third-party verification that a product or facility meets defined quality standards. They also function as market access requirements. Major retailers, Amazon, and international markets each have their own certification expectations. Missing a required certification can lock you out of sales channels entirely.
Describe how a nutrient affects the body's structure or function. Example: 'Supports immune health.' No FDA pre-approval required but must be truthful, substantiated, and include the DSHEA disclaimer. Most supplement claims fall in this category.
Describe the level of a nutrient in the product. Example: 'High in Vitamin C' or 'Good source of calcium.' These must meet specific FDA thresholds defined in 21 CFR 101.54.
Describe a relationship between a nutrient and a disease or health condition. Example: 'Adequate calcium may reduce the risk of osteoporosis.'
A third-party GMP certification for supplement manufacturers, audited annually against the ANSI-accredited NSF/ANSI 455-2 standard with a searchable public registry. Many retailers require third-party GMP certification as a baseline.
Product-level verification from the United States Pharmacopeia. Tests that the product contains what the label declares, meets quality specifications, and is made under GMP. Carries strong consumer recognition.
Required to market supplements as 'organic.' Certification under the National Organic Program (NOP) covers ingredient sourcing, processing methods, and facility requirements. Must be certified by a USDA-accredited certifying agent (QAI, Oregon Tilth, etc.).
Third-party verification that a product meets the Non-GMO Project Standard. Requires testing of at-risk ingredients and ongoing compliance. Growing consumer demand makes this valuable for retail positioning.
Specifically for sports nutrition products. NSF's Certified for Sport program page says it tests for 290 banned substances. The program also reviews label accuracy. Required by many professional sports leagues and athletic organizations.
Disclaimer: This page is educational content, not legal or regulatory advice. Compliance requirements vary by product, ingredient, market, and jurisdiction. Consult qualified regulatory counsel. See our Terms of Service for details.
A structure-function claim describes the role of a nutrient or dietary ingredient in affecting the structure or function of the body. Example: 'Calcium builds strong bones.' These claims do not require FDA pre-approval but must be truthful, not misleading, and substantiated. They must include the DSHEA disclaimer: 'This statement has not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.'
FDA registration and cGMP compliance are legally required. Beyond that, it depends on your market. Retail chains often require NSF GMP or USP verification. Organic products need USDA Organic certification. Sports nutrition brands benefit from NSF Certified for Sport or Informed Sport. Amazon requires specific documentation. Start with what your sales channels require.
NSF International and USP (United States Pharmacopeia) both provide independent quality verification, but they test different things. NSF GMP certifies that a manufacturing facility follows good manufacturing practices. USP Verified certifies that a specific product contains what it claims, dissolves properly, and is free of harmful contaminants. NSF audits the facility; USP tests the product.
A basic label review for FDA compliance runs $1,000-3,000. Full claims substantiation review costs $3,000-10,000. NSF GMP facility audit runs $5,000-15,000 annually. USP Verified product testing costs $3,000-8,000 per product. USDA Organic certification is $2,000-8,000 per year. Consultant fees for audit preparation add $5,000-25,000.
This is the FTC's substantiation standard for health-related claims. The FTC's Health Products Compliance Guidance (2022) says: “As a general matter, substantiation of health-related benefits will need to be in the form of randomized, controlled human clinical testing to meet the competent and reliable scientific standard.” Animal studies, in-vitro studies, and traditional use alone are usually insufficient for specific health claims.
Tell us about your compliance and certification needs. We'll help connect you with qualified consultants and auditors.
Every listing cites its sources.